Support NATA 2014

palaniaiwaiwapalaniaiwaiwa

Main News Favorites Reviews Stats
Follow palaniaiwaiwa
palaniaiwaiwa
Age / Gender:
n/a, Male
Location:
Here
Joined:
4/8/09
All Stats >

User Statshot

Community Stats
Level 4 Blank Slate
Normal Whistle
Ranked as Civilian

Contact Info / Websites

Latest News


So I was looking back through my audio reviews, and realized that I gave away way to many 8's 9's and 10's. Although the majority of my audio reviews are vote "helpful" none of them really contain anything the author could use, mostly because I only reviewed stuff I liked.

So first off I'm going to try and make sure I review every or at least most songs I listen too. I also want to make sure to be a little stricter on how I review.

Also, I am going to re-work my grading formula (which was originally written as:
(technical complexity + (emotionally moving * 2))/3
While this formula worked for a while, it has several flaws. I will post a re-written formula hopefully by Saturday. This re-work will contain several different factors of varying importance. For example title (whether it made me want to listen to the song, and whether I suited the song or not) will be a criteria of low importance. I will also be sure to include a small list of each factor, and the score I give for that along with a brief description of what each factor means, why the author was given that score, and what they should do to improve it. The equation, and a brief description of the different parts will also be given to help the authors better understand how they where graded.

Hopefully these improvements will prove more helpful to artist and serve as a way to hone their skill as well as brainstorm their imagination.